mazda cx vs subaru crossover reliability

#Mazda cx vs subaru crossover reliability android

Based on this comparison of the Mazda CX-5's and the Subaru Forester's specifications and ratings, the Subaru Forester is a better car than the Mazda CX-5.Ī used 2023 Mazda CX-5 ranges from $28,891 to $38,519 while a used 2023 Subaru Forester is priced between $31,996 to $39,588. The Subaru Forester has the advantage in the areas of fuel efficiency, reliability, resale value, interior volume and overall quality score. The 2020 Honda CR-V and 2020 Mazda CX-5 are more alike than they are different-but their differences will split buyers who prioritize performance and those who value practicality.When comparing the Mazda CX-5's and the Subaru Forester's specifications and ratings, the Mazda CX-5 has the advantage in the areas of new vehicle base pricing, typical lower range of pricing for one- to five-year-old used cars, and base engine power. The EX represents a much bigger price jump of $2,500 to the next trim, but comes with 7.0-inch touchscreen, smartphone compatibility, 18-inch wheels, heated front seats, keyless ignition and more. Skip the base LX CR-V and its measly 5.0-inch touchscreen. The 7.0-inch touchscreen on the CX-5 hasn’t kept pace with newer touchscreens, and can be frustrating to use if you don’t utilize the presets. The CX-5’s Touring trim, which should not be confused with the CR-V’s top Touring trim, costs about $1,600 more than the base model and adds smartphone compatibility, synthetic leather instead of cloth seats, heated front seats, and keyless entry.

#Mazda cx vs subaru crossover reliability android

Apple CarPlay and Android Auto won’t come on base models of either, but that is just one reason we’d recommend stepping up a trim level.

The feature list compares well with either, and for the CX-5 the price differences come down to engine choice. But the headlights on the CX-5 helped it best the CR-V with a Top Safety Pick+ designation. The CR-V has this gear as well, which helped earn it an IIHS Top Safety Pick in 2019. Life-saving equipment such as automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, active lane control, and blind-spot monitors come standard.

Mazda finally came around to the competition’s way of things by offering more standard safety features in the 2020 CX-5. Up front, the CX-5 fancies itself as more sophisticated, especially in Signature trim with soft nappa leather contrasting genuine wood trim. The high seat position, great outward vision, 12-way power adjustable seats, deep console, clever storage areas, and plenty of cupholders play to the practical buyer. Rear-seat CX-5 passengers feel the squeeze on flat seats.Įven on stiffer 19-inch wheels, the CR-V goes long on comfort. Both models have about 40 inches of second-row leg room, but the CR-V is wider, taller, and longer, good for about 40 cubic feet of cargo compared to 31 cubic feet in the CX-5. But it’s much more than just a spec comparison. Honda makes them larger, and the inside of the 2020 CR-V proves it. The front-wheel-drive CR-V gets 28 mpg city, 34 highway, 30 combined. It lacks the responsiveness of the CX-5’s larger engine, and lacks the verve of the CX-5’s suspension tuning.īut it is more efficient, even before EPA rates the fuel economy for the 2020 CR-V Hybrid, which should average about 45 mpg combined. The punchy powertrain is smooth but gets loud the harder you push the throttle. New for 2020 in the CR-V is a 190-hp 1.5-liter turbo-4 with a continuously variable transmission.

It stays low and planted, with less body roll than most of the competitors, including the CR-V. Most importantly, the CX-5 handles like a smaller car or tall wagon. It’s quicker, quieter, and boosted by a sport mode that holds the gears longer. These models come with a 227-hp 2.5-liter turbo-4 with the 6-speed making 310 pound-feet of torque. All-wheel drive costs $1,400 more, but it comes standard on the Grand Touring Reserve ($36,235) and top Signature ($38,255) trims. The base engine in the 2020 Mazda CX-5 is a 187-horsepower 2.5-liter inline-4 with a 6-speed automatic making 186 pound-feet of torque. It’s more flowing and less bulbous than the CR-V, and it outperforms the CR-V. The exterior has held up well, as the long hood and short overhangs of the CX-5 reflect its sportier vibe.